Home Industry News Releases Wine Shipping Laws in California and 20 Other States Ruled Unconstitutional

Wine Shipping Laws in California and 20 Other States Ruled Unconstitutional

2277
2
Advertisement

National Association of Wine Retailers Urges Legislative Action to Fix Laws and Benefit Consumers

(Sacramento, CALIF)—Twenty-one states across the country, including California, are in violation of the Constitution following the Supreme Court’s Tennessee Wine v Thomas decision in June. According to research undertaken by the National Association of Wine Retailers (NAWR), wine shipping laws in these twenty-one states violate the Commerce Clause with their bans on wine shipments from out-of-state wine retailers.

In Tennessee Wine v Thomas, Justice Samuel Alito held that states may not pass laws that discriminate against out-of-state wine stores and retailers by banning them from shipping wine to consumers. According to NAWR, twenty-one states need to consider changes to their wine shipping laws in order to come into compliance with the Constitution.

In the wake of the June Supreme Court ruling, lawsuits challenging bans on wine shipments from out of state have already been filed in Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, and Texas.

The remaining states with unconstitutional wine shipping laws are Arizona, California, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island South Carolina and Washington State.

“The Court spoke loud and clear in Tennessee Wine v Thomas when it held that states may not discriminate against out-of-state wine stores by banning their wine shipments into the state, while at the same time allowing their own wine stores to ship wine to their state’s consumers,” said Tom Wark, executive director of NAWR. “While we support the lawsuits filed in seven states, we think lawmakers in the other 14, including California, ought to take it upon themselves to fix their wine shipping laws, give their consumers access to wines they can’t find locally and abandon their protectionist wine shipping laws.”

NAWR has drafted a Model Wine Retailer Shipping Bill now located on its website that can help guide states as they begin the legislative work to fix their unconstitutional retailer wine shipping laws.

About NAWR

The National Association of Wine Retailers represents wine stores, wine auction houses, Internet wine retailers and wine-of-the-month clubs nationwide. Its mission includes advocating for a level playing field for wine sales and distribution. For more information see www.nawr.org

Advertisement

2 COMMENTS

  1. How do brick-and-mortar retailers selling wine online, and online-only wine sellers verify the age of online wine buyers . . . beyond “self-disclosure” declaration?

    Is the wine buyer’s age independently verified by the online seller contacting the debit or credit card issuer used in the online transaction?

    Is the wine buyer’s age independently verified by a third-party service provider?  (And if so, how exactly is that done?)

    It would be so easy for a minor to lie about her or his age when purchasing wine online.  And have a complicit adult sign for the wine delivery.

    This is not a rhetorical question.

    I genuinely encourage NAWR’s substantive reply.

    ~~ Bob

  2. It would be even easier for a complicit adult to walk into a liquor store and buy alcohol for a minor. At least the minor would have to have a credit card if buying online — that eliminates almost everyone under 18.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.